In Armageddon (1998), parts of the impending asteroid strike Paris. (Image credit: Touchstone Pictures) Both "Deep Impact" and "Armageddon" were perfectly timed to capitalize on Hollywood's pre ...

Deep Impact is still a big blockbuster, and it’s still kinda silly (Elijah Wood outruns a tidal wave on a motorcycle for crying out loud), but it stands the test of time better than Armageddon ...

‘Deep Impact,’ ‘Armageddon’: How two ’98 movies tackled doom from above 25 summers ago, filmgoers had their choice of cataclysmic comet movies — one with big stars and big noise, the ...

Analysis: The basic story foundation is exactly the same, except in Armageddon they have to bury the bomb deep inside the meteor as opposed to Deep Impact‘s surface explosion, which doesn’t ...

RELATED: 90 thoughts we had while watching Armageddon and Deep Impact back to back. In the end, Deep Impact played a little bit loose with the truth, for narrative satisfaction.

Armageddon: 4 points. Deep Impact: 6 points. Well, it looks like we finally have a winner in this fight to world destroy the world with comets that were dead-set on destroying the planet.

To talk about why Deep Impact failed to capture audiences’ attention back in 1998, and why it deserves our respect in 2018, it must be compared not only to Armageddon, but within the context of ...

In 'Deep Impact,' 'Armageddon,' asteroids threaten Earth. Which film was more realistic? NASA scientists weigh in. Wait, are you saying Hollywood had asteroid science wrong the whole time?

Wood breaks down why Deep Impact is more than a disaster movie. Released in the same year as Armageddon, Deep Impact sees humanity preparing for and attempting to destroy a giant comet headed ...